Quote from: TDoS on Apr 27, 2026, 05:31 PMsurely you could have done better than your normal littany of anti-establishment rhetoric to combat it?
Quote from: RE on Apr 26, 2026, 07:40 PMQuote from: TDoS on Apr 26, 2026, 05:15 PMQuote from: REDefinitely a phase change coming.Already has. It began 10 years ago when Americans thought voting in dementia addled geriatrics was a good idea. Maybe by the fall of 2028 we can hope for a phase change just from NOT doing that again.
New generation coming in! Don Jr. Vs Hunter Biden for POTUS! Even betteer, I read a while back Barron Trump was looking to get into politics. Either party wins, we get the Winkelvoss Twins for Treasury Secretary and Fed Chairman. Da Fed will be replace by the 1st Crypto Bank of the FSoA and the Dollar replaced by a basket of blockchain currencies including Bittcoin, Stablecoin and Moosecoin. Epstein will be exhumed, resurrected and appointed Secretary of Jailbait Welfare. Elon Musk will singlehandedly fix the declining birthrate by buying up the White Slave trade and impregnating the entire female population of models in Eastern Europe.
Happy Days are here again.
RE
QuoteHello everybody!
So I may have given a lot of people a surprise today. Let me start off by apologizing to everyone whose trust I abused.
I apologize to my parents for saying I had an interview without specifying it was for "Most Wanted."
I apologize to my colleagues and students for saying I had a personal emergency (by the time anyone reads this, I probably most certainly DO need to go to the ER, but can hardly call that not a self-inflicted status.)
I apologize to all of the people I traveled next to, all the workers who handled my luggage, and all the other non-targeted people at the hotel who I put in danger simply by being near.
I apologize to everyone who was abused and/or murdered before this, to all those who suffered before I was able to attempt this, to all who may still suffer after, regardless of my success or failure.
I don't expect forgiveness, but if I could have seen any other way to get this close, I would have taken it. Again, my sincere apologies.
On to why I did any of this:
I am a citizen of the United States of America.
What my representatives do reflects on me.
And I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes.
(Well, to be completely honest, I was no longer willing a long time ago, but this is the first real opportunity I've had to do something about it.)
While I'm discussing this, I'll also go over my expected rules of engagement (probably in a terrible format, but I'm not military so too bad.)
Administration officials (not including Mr. Patel): they are targets, prioritized from highest-ranking to lowest
Secret Service: they are targets only if necessary, and to be incapacitated non-lethally if possible (aka, I hope they're wearing body armor because center mass with shotguns messes up people who *aren't*
Hotel Security: not targets if at all possible (aka unless they shoot at me)
Capitol Police: same as Hotel Security
National Guard: same as Hotel Security
Hotel Employees: not targets at all
Guests: not targets at all
In order to minimize casualties I will also be using buckshot rather than slugs (less penetration through walls)
I would still go through most everyone here to get to the targets if it were absolutely necessary (on the basis that most people *chose* to attend a speech by a pedophile, rapist, and traitor, and are thus complicit) but I really hope it doesn't come to that.
Rebuttals to objections:
Objection 1: As a Christian, you should turn the other cheek.
Rebuttal: Turning the other cheek is for when you yourself are oppressed. I'm not the person raped in a detention camp. I'm not the fisherman executed without trial. I'm not a schoolkid blown up or a child starved or a teenage girl abused by the many criminals in this administration.
Turning the other cheek when *someone else* is oppressed is not Christian behavior; it is complicity in the oppressor's crimes.
Objection 2: This is not a convenient time for you to do this.
Rebuttal: I need whoever thinks this way to take a couple minutes and realize that the world isn't about them. Do you think that when I see someone raped or murdered or abused, I should walk on by because it would be "inconvenient" for people who aren't the victim?
This was the best timing and chance of success I could come up with.
Objection 3: You didn't get them all.
Rebuttal: Gotta start somewhere.
Objection 4: As a half-black, half-white person, you shouldn't be the one doing this.
Rebuttal: I don't see anyone else picking up the slack
Objection 5: Yield unto Caesar what is Caesar's.
Rebuttal: The United States of America are ruled by the law, not by any one or several people. In so far as representatives and judges do not follow the law, no one is required to yield them anything so unlawfully ordered.
I would also like to extend my appreciation to a great many people since I will not be likely to be able to talk with them again (unless the Secret Service is *astoundingly* incompetent.)
Thank you to my family, both personal and church, for your love over these 31 years.
Thank you to my friends, for your companionship over many years.
Thank you to my colleagues over many jobs, for your positivity and professionalism.
Thank you to my students for your enthusiasm and love of learning.
Thank you to the many acquaintances I've met, in person and online, for short interactions and long-term relationships, for your perspectives and inspiration.
Thank you all for everything.
Sincerely,
Cole "coldForce" "Friendly Federal Assassin" Allen
PS: Ok now that all the sappy stuff is done, what the hell is the Secret Service doing? Sorry, gonna rant a bit here and drop the formal tone.
Like, I expected security cameras at every bend, bugged hotel rooms, armed agents every 10 feet, metal detectors out the wazoo.
What I got (who knows, maybe they're pranking me!) is nothing.
No damn security.
Not in transport.
Not in the hotel.
Not in the event.
Like, the one thing that I immediately noticed walking into the hotel is the sense of arrogance.
I walk in with multiple weapons and not a single person there considers the possibility that I could be a threat.
The security at the event is all outside, focused on protestors and current arrivals, because apparently no one thought about what happens if someone checks in the day before.
Like, this level of incompetence is insane, and I very sincerely hope it's corrected by the time this country gets actually competent leadership again.
Like, if I was an Iranian agent, instead of an American citizen, I could have brought a damn Ma Deuce in here and no one would have noticed shit.
Dude. They know you are there. You are a weapon of mass deception, and you do not even know you are part of a plan. That is the point. Since you don't know, there is no connection to you for anyone to trace. You are just one of a few thousand targeted individuals. But you are a targeted individual with a three word name going on. And you are the one who happens to be in the right place at the right time. All they needed was for you to walk through the door, and for you to let your freak flag fly. They did not need your cooperation. They just needed you to do your thing. That way if any doors were opened for you to get to the main event to do your thing, there is no way for anyone to ever know. Their deniability is not simply plausible. It is actual. Total operational security. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is in a living tomb, and like him you will soon be too. The same one. Patsies for life both of you. <- Kdog
Actually insane.
Oh and if anyone is curious is how doing something like feels: it's awful. I want to throw up; I want to cry for all the things I wanted to do and never will, for all the people whose trust this betrays; I experience rage thinking about everything this administration has done.
Can't really recommend it! Stay in school, kids.
Quote from: TDoS on Apr 26, 2026, 05:15 PMQuote from: REDefinitely a phase change coming.Already has. It began 10 years ago when Americans thought voting in dementia addled geriatrics was a good idea. Maybe by the fall of 2028 we can hope for a phase change just from NOT doing that again.
Quote from: RE on Apr 26, 2026, 01:31 PMTrue it was followed through with, and after the depression and Stalin crushing the Ukie independence movement, it worked fine.
Quote from: REAlso worked OK before under Lenin & Trotsky before the depression. After the early problems in China, it worked so well they had to institute a 1 child policy to keep the population from ballooning up too fast.
Quote from: REYou conflate the problems of totalitarianism with communism.Only because communists appear to love being totalitarian states. Why aren't you regaling me with stories of how well the North Koreans have it compared to their poor, downtrodden southern neighbors? Are all South Koreans yearning to move North to be free of their capitalist overlords?
Quote from: REThey are not one in the same thing.I agree. Too bad they just LOOK that way sometimes. Like, in between killing off millions because, you know, totalitarians LOVE Communism because it is GREAT for totaltarian rulers to make everyone do what they want.
Quote from: RECapitalism and totalitarianism aren't the same either, together they are called Fascism. Lotta problems with that system also, as we begin to see now here in the FSoA.
Quote from: REDefinitely a phase change coming.Already has. It began 10 years ago when Americans thought voting in dementia addled geriatrics was a good idea. Maybe by the fall of 2028 we can hope for a phase change just from NOT doing that again.
Quote from: RE on Apr 26, 2026, 01:31 PMTrue it was followed through with, and after the depression and Stalin crushing the Ukie independence movement, it worked fine. Also worked OK before under Lenin & Trotsky before the depression. After the early problems in China, it worked so well they had to institute a 1 child policy to keep the population from ballooning up too fast.The Soviet Union after 1923 was a degenerated workers' state. Property was formally nationalized, but political power had been usurped by a privileged bureaucracy that pushed aside soviet democracy and the working class. Trotsky rejected the sloppy equation of 'Stalinism = socialism.' as Stalinism was a counterrevolutionary distortion arising from the objective contradictions produced by the material conditions of the time.
You conflate the problems of totalitarianism with communism. They are not one in the same thing. Capitalism and totalitarianism aren't the same either, together they are called Fascism. Lotta problems with that system also, as we begin to see now here in the FSoA.
Definitely a phase change coming. Lots more water evaporating from the oceans and lakes into the atmosphere.
RE





Quote from: RE on Apr 26, 2026, 11:24 AM10s of 10*6s starving is a drop in the bucket compared to 10*8 or more that will die when the fertilizer starts running short.Sure. And when global cooling kicks in a big chunk of the Earth's population will die-off, as claimed in 1970 by folks with degrees in the field and whatnot. Doomers of the day as well I imagine. Folks all agreed.
Quote from: REPrior to the invention of the Haber process prior to WWII, the carrying capacity of the earth for homo sapiens was estimated at no more than 1.6-2B people. At the time, Fritz Haber estimated they only had about 5-10 years before they hit the max.
Quote from: REThe goal of getting more people back into agriculture wasn't wrong, it was just poorly implemented and rushed.
Quote from: REHad it been followed through with back then, we never would have got into the situation of having 8.3B people ambulating around terra firma in the first place.It was followed through. All those folks died, and the fearless leaders who liked your idea, changed their minds when it turned out that just everyone died.
Quote from: REThe Great Depression, bad management, poor planning and weaponization of starvation as means to squash the Ukrainian independence movement caused the Holodomor. Castro and the Cubans had very good results with their collectivization of farming, and the Israelis have had good results with their Kibbutzes. When they are not dropping bombs killing and maiming towel head kids, they run very efficient communal farms.
RE