Quote from: RE on Apr 26, 2026, 01:31 PMTrue it was followed through with, and after the depression and Stalin crushing the Ukie independence movement, it worked fine. Also worked OK before under Lenin & Trotsky before the depression. After the early problems in China, it worked so well they had to institute a 1 child policy to keep the population from ballooning up too fast.The Soviet Union after 1923 was a degenerated workers' state. Property was formally nationalized, but political power had been usurped by a privileged bureaucracy that pushed aside soviet democracy and the working class. Trotsky rejected the sloppy equation of 'Stalinism = socialism.' as Stalinism was a counterrevolutionary distortion arising from the objective contradictions produced by the material conditions of the time.
You conflate the problems of totalitarianism with communism. They are not one in the same thing. Capitalism and totalitarianism aren't the same either, together they are called Fascism. Lotta problems with that system also, as we begin to see now here in the FSoA.
Definitely a phase change coming. Lots more water evaporating from the oceans and lakes into the atmosphere.
RE





Quote from: RE on Apr 26, 2026, 11:24 AM10s of 10*6s starving is a drop in the bucket compared to 10*8 or more that will die when the fertilizer starts running short.Sure. And when global cooling kicks in a big chunk of the Earth's population will die-off, as claimed in 1970 by folks with degrees in the field and whatnot. Doomers of the day as well I imagine. Folks all agreed.
Quote from: REPrior to the invention of the Haber process prior to WWII, the carrying capacity of the earth for homo sapiens was estimated at no more than 1.6-2B people. At the time, Fritz Haber estimated they only had about 5-10 years before they hit the max.
Quote from: REThe goal of getting more people back into agriculture wasn't wrong, it was just poorly implemented and rushed.
Quote from: REHad it been followed through with back then, we never would have got into the situation of having 8.3B people ambulating around terra firma in the first place.It was followed through. All those folks died, and the fearless leaders who liked your idea, changed their minds when it turned out that just everyone died.
Quote from: REThe Great Depression, bad management, poor planning and weaponization of starvation as means to squash the Ukrainian independence movement caused the Holodomor. Castro and the Cubans had very good results with their collectivization of farming, and the Israelis have had good results with their Kibbutzes. When they are not dropping bombs killing and maiming towel head kids, they run very efficient communal farms.
RE
Quote from: RE on Apr 25, 2026, 06:10 PMFar as Mao and Pol Pot are concerned, they had good ideas and bad ones.
Quote from: RECollective ownership of the means of production and abolishment of private property is a pretty good idea.Stalin thought the same, and handed Ukraine the Holodomor. When will these "good ideas" that in the past just murdered tens of millions finally work do you think?
Quote from: REPurging the society of the rich and privileged elite also a pretty good idea. Abolishment of capitalism also good. Purging Universities of intellectuals not so good.
Quote from: RESuburb dwellers going back to farming is a pretty good idea, it's certainly a more sustainable form of living than shopping at the mall and commuting 50 miles a day in traffic to work in a 100 story tall air conditioned skyscraper.So you are with Heinberg, Pol Pot, Mao and Stalin when it comes to this "back to farming" idea? What happens to folks unable to participate like you, just bullets to the head or a gas chamber?
Quote from: RE....just that the dependence on a finite resource was bound to cause disruption when the resource became hard to come by. It doesn't take much to disrupt a complex system, as evidenced by the fact is all it takes to completely screw up the global economy is a few towel heads with speed boats and shoulder fired missiles and RPGs.Dependence on finite resources is WHAT HUMANS HAVE DONE to date. It isn't as though humans all got together at a big confernece during the hunting and gathering stage and decided to stay that way, knowing in advance what dependency on non-renewables would entail. Although any economist could also argue )and do) that this dependency is required to leverage to a future we can see right now (even if it is the early stages) of renewable energy, fusion waiting inthe wings, an electrified world, the ability to increase recovery factors and efficiencies in accessing those non-renewable resources, and so on and so forth. Economics isn't a physical or natural science for a reason, but it does allow for GREAT storytelling.
Quote from: REAnyhow, whether PO occured in 2008, 2018 or sometime in the future, we're definitely in the deep doo doo now as the shortages begin migrating from Asia to ports all over the world.Pick a year anywhere between Jan 1 1900 and today and I'll come up with a deep doo-doo story. Dooming is what doomers do, if not the Mayan Calendar, then peak oil. If not that, then Yellowstone. Continue ad infinitum. "Being in deep do do" is a throwaway perpetual motion machine among the doomer legions. You've still got a working brain, you can at least pretend you aren't the only one in the room with one.
QuoteTEHRAN (Tasnim) – The Khatam al-Anbia Central Headquarters of Iran warned that continued acts of blockade and maritime piracy by the United States will trigger a strong response from the Iranian Armed Forces.
In a statement released on Saturday, the Khatam al-Anbia Central Headquarters stressed that if the US aggressive military continues naval blockade, banditry, and piracy in the region, it will face a response from Iran's powerful Armed Forces.
The statement said the US should be aware that the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran possess greater might and readiness than before to defend the country's sovereignty, territory, and national interests. It added that the US military had already experienced part of Iran's offensive capabilities during the "third imposed war".
The headquarters further stated that Iranian forces remain prepared and determined to monitor the behavior and movements of their enemies in the region, while continuing to manage and control the strategic Strait of Hormuz.
It warned that in the event of renewed aggression by the US and the Zionist regime, they would face even heavier losses.
On February 28, the United States and the Israeli regime launched an unprovoked war of aggression against Iran, during which then Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyed Ali Khamenei and several senior military officials were martyred.
Iranian Armed Forces responded with weeks of missile and drone strikes targeting American and Israeli military positions in the occupied territories and the Persian Gulf region, inflicting heavy damages in 100 waves of counterattacks over a period of 40 days.
A Pakistani-mediated ceasefire lasting two weeks was reached on April 8, paving the way for talks in Islamabad. During those negotiations, Iran put forward a ten-point proposal that included the withdrawal of US forces and the removal of sanctions.
However, after 21 hours of negotiations on April 11 and 12, the sides failed to reach a deal, with Iranian representatives pointing to deep mistrust regarding Washington's willingness to honor its commitments.
Iran has made clear that any return to ceasefire negotiations depends on the lifting of the US naval blockade. Officials have argued that the continued blockade constitutes a violation of the truce.
Quote from: K-Dog on Apr 25, 2026, 10:17 PMTASNIMNEWS.IR • 2026-04-25
US Warned of Iran’s Severe Response to Piracy
The Khatam al-Anbia Central Headquarters of Iran warned that continued acts of blockade and maritime piracy by the United States will trigger a strong response from the Iranian Armed Forces.





