Those micro-nukes that are supposed to be a game changer may not be quite as good a solution as some of their proponents have claimed.
This is a particularly difficult area in the energy tech-solutions space to ferret out the truth, because it's very polarized. The people who are anti-nuke are vehemently so, they claim huge insoluble problems. The folks who are pro-nuke see it as well understood technology that can provide the energy we need safely without CO2 emissions. They recommend going balls to the wall with nukes.
Although long term safety and environmental disasters are the biggest concern, short term the huge cost overruns all these projects seem to have are the biggest problem. They just cost too damn much, and by the Kw, the smaller they are the more the juice costs.
Bottom line, probably not a solution hoped for by micro nuke proponents.
https://cosmosmagazine.com/science/engineering/small-reactors-dont-add-up/
Small reactors don't add up as a viable energy source
RE
Small reactors don’t add up as a viable energy source
Started by RE May 05, 2024, 07:48 AM
Message path : / Society / Tech is always to the rescue / Tech won't save us / The Nuke Cavalry Riding to the Rescue #5
Selected path :