• Science
    • Planetary Material Conditions
    • Society
    • Politics
    • Doom
    • Doom Philosophy
    • Solutions
    • General category
    • Revolution
  • Move
  • Topic
  • Back
  • Next

    In Supreme Court battle over transgender rights, conservatives look to an unlikely

    Started by RE Dec 03, 2024, 08:23 PM

    Message path : / Politics / The FSOA / In Supreme Court battle over transgender rights, conservatives look to an unlikely


    Selected path :

    RE

    • Administrator
    • *****
    • Chief Intellectual Dry Humper
    • Posts: 1,751
    Dec 03, 2024, 08:23 PM
    Call it The Great Distraction.

    The endless political battle over Gender related issues from public bathrooms to prisons to gym locker rooms and sports participation is now headed for the SCOTUS, where the Black Robes will rule on whether or not it's OK to pump minors full of hormones that block puberty or make biological males develop female secondary sex characteristics or females develop male ones.  None of these hormones actually cause XY boys to grow vaginas or a uterus or XX girls to grow a cock and balls.  Simulating those organs requires some surgical slicing & dicing.  Not sure if these surgical mutilations are actually being done on preteens here in the FSoA, but I am assuming they also are subject to this SCOTUS ruling and case.

    Somewhat surprisingly these interventions have already been banned in the Scandinavian countries where gender altering surgeries were first performed in the 1950s and first experimented with by Nazi doctors in prison camps during WWII.  The first widely known American to get the surgery was Christine Jorgensen in the early 1950s, right after the war.

    I find it positively abhorrent that such manipulations would be done on people before they are even supoosed to have sex at all.  The surgery is definitely irreversible and sterilizes the person, and the puberty blockers have side effects that go beyond merely pausing when you start to grow boobs or facial hair.  It affects growth and brain development also.   The trans lobby however supports all of this as medically safe and proper treatment for kids with gender dysphoria.

    To me, it's CFS that Tranny women or girls are not level with biological women or girls, and letting them compete with them is utterly ruinous for women's sports and totally unfair.  Putting men who call themselves women but still in possession of male genitalia and putting them in women's prisons is also CFS stupid.  If they have had the surgery, OK, but not if the meatpole still works.

    This whole nonsense is destroying the Democratic Party.  Minority groups like hispanics who should be voting Demodope on important economic issues vote Repugnant because CFS won't allow them to support the gender bending politically correct WOKE ideas about gender.

    Obviously in this case I side with the Rep and I'm pretty sure the right wing SCOTUS will uphold the TN ban.  Sadly, this same political spin also supports banning Abortion, which I don't agree with.  That also violates CFS, in the other direction.

    We need a CFS Political Party.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2024/12/03/conservatives-europe-supreme-court-gender-affirming-care-ban-00192378

    In Supreme Court battle over transgender rights, conservatives look to an unlikely ally: Europe

    RE

    This is a

    new Diner page

    Logged in as:Guest
    Forum Home