Quote from: TDoS on Dec 11, 2024, 05:19 PMGail was referenced as a specific example of the kind of "expert" that supplies articles to places that can't get their hands on the experts, or afford them, to get the quality of answers similar to the one I provided.
Well maybe, but she wasn't referenced here by name and I doubt she was one of the people polled by Reuters. You already agreed Reuters has plenty of money and resources to afford quality experts also, so it's not a question of insufficient funds. Therefore, there must be another explanation underlying the motive for publishing such a poll.
QuoteI don't get huffy. Ever.
You should read your own prose for tone.
Quote from: TdosOf course you don't. You have your way of figuring out problems, it has worked for you since you were 4 and smarter than everyone around you. You've decided you are correct, therefore you are correct. All quite self referential.
Huffiness in extremis. lol
RE