Quote from: K-Dog on Jan 19, 2025, 09:52 PMQuote from: TDoS on Jan 18, 2025, 03:52 PMThe same reason people would take the published work of M. K. Hubbert and say he was absolutely right when those charts of his certainly don't look anything like the actual results?That would be nobody here. You trapped yourself.
Really? Well, I have been known to be wrong before, and probably have trapped myself before, but how about a demonstration as to why it hasn't happened on THIS topic?
Quote from: K-DogTherefore MKH has only ever been acknowledgedin a qualitative way, and not in the quantitative way you claim. What you claim is logically impossible.
I present....Hubbert happily doing the logically impossible quantatative representation of US oil production.
Reference:Hubberts 1956 Paper - Nuclear Energy and the Fossil Fuels
Figure 21.
For an encore...Hubbert doing the impossible....a second time! For the world!
Yes K-Dog, Hubbert did quantatatively list his thoughts on VOLUMES of oil for the US and world. And they are both really, really, wrong.
Bigly.
Anything else we want to learn today?