QuoteTrump once hosted party for 'young women' where Epstein was the only guest.

QuoteDemonstrates that Trump was more than a customer.  Beyond doubt.  Trump dabbled in Epstein's bizness.

Well, here's the thing.  If you suspect child abuse, all states have mandatory reporting requirements for teachers, health care workers, social workers and cops.  A few states require anyone to report.  Even if there isn't a legal obligation, there's a moral obligation.  The problem of course is that just an accusation is enough to destroy a person's life, even if it's untrue.  So you need to be pretty damn sure before you accuse someone.

In Epstein's case though, everybody who knew him and hung out with him knew he was a "creep", obviously including The Donald.  Why ELSE would he hold a party for underage girls and specifically invite Epstein?  This is the crime of pandering which Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted of, and Trump was doing the same thing by holding the party.  So whether or not he dipped his wick in any of those girls, if Epstein did then he's guilty of pandering.

Trump will of course claim ignorance of Epstein's proclivities, but is it plausible that he was ignorant and held parties for the girls?  How old were they?  Publicly with Epstein far as I am aware we've only heard about 17 year olds, which people are less revolted by than 15 year olds, less still than 12 year olds.  What was the age range at this party?

At the very least, his failure to report what he must have known was ocurring is morally reprehensible.  It's pretty clear though that not only did he fail to report, he was making these girls available to Epstein.  That's pandering.

RE