Quote from: K-Dog on Aug 13, 2025, 11:29 AMBig Balls!
Three AM in the morning on a WA DC street, there is an alleged hijacking and no surveillance cameras catch a single goddamn frame.

There is no requirement of a camera being where he seems to have been assaulted.

Quote from: K-DogFurther, Whenever I get the shit beat out of me I always have an overwhelming desire to take my shirt off and get photographed in a semi-catatonic state.

And how many times have you had the shit beat out of you...in order to establish a proper sample size of your range behavior after circumstances like these?
I am light on "beat down" experiences...as a youngster I could run like the wind.....good way to stay away from others looking to cause trouble.

Quote from: K-DogThree AM in the morning, this DOGE work must be EZ stuff if you can be out at three AM.

I was under the impression that BigBalls had already left DOGE some time ago?

Big Ball no longer works for the US Government-Circa June 24

Quote from: K-DogMost damming is the lack of photo surveillance.

Not damning at all unless all cubic footage in Washington DC has a camera pointed at it. So you assume that all Washington DC cubic footage has a camera pointed at it because.....1) you've been there and discovered this or 2) you assume it because all the other times you got the shit beat out of you there were cameras,therfore everyplace else must be the same?

Quote from: K=DogI doubt it is possible to sneeze in DC without getting the sneeze on video.

Your doubt, the presumption of cameras, or just saying it because without it the logic tends to fall apart is of zero value in proving anything. Surely you've been to court before, are familiar with the rules of how PROOF works, rather than speculation, hysterical arm waving, conspiracy theories or just making shit up works? Sort of like science, except not as stringent.

Quote from: K-DogGiven the amount of blood, an equal amount pain can be assumed.

Big Ball haters can certainly speculate he doesn't suffer from congenital analgesia, absolutely. It is a rare disorder, so it seems completely reasonable that whomever decided to use him as a punching bag delivered more than a little hurt.

Quote from: K-DogThe fact that Big Balls has the foresight to neatly drape his shirt over his shoulder shows beyond doubt that Big Balls is indeed a bad-ass.

Indeed. A very well posed photo showing bad-ass hood. IF he put the shirt on his shoulder, as opposed to someone else after he had used it to wipe off some of blood and just left it laying on the ground or his leg or something.

Quote from: K-DogIf anybody is going to steal Social Security let it be him.  Oh, wait.  He already did that.

As someone on Social Security, can you enumerate the amount you have lost to date because of Big Balls? Before June 24th anyway.

Quote from: K-DogThere is so much wrong with this 'incident' it will be believed.

Alternatively, good internet conspiraices need to be have more and better evidence than we've been presented with so far. Which appears to be....just....a picture and a report that it happened.

Quote from: K-DogLooking away from the camera with eyes closed after a beat-down.  Really?

How much time did you spend staring into a camera during your (as of now unknown) number of beat downs? Any at all? Certainly if I had been smacked around I can't say posing for whomever was taking photos would be high on my mind. Never suffered a beat down, so I lack experience in exactly how I reacted next. Been in a gunfight...sure. But that doesn't count.

But I can't wait to hear about your most recent brawling event and how things worked out, to know all this information about how you reacted later, with or without cameras and whatnot. I was more of a "run like the wind" kinda guy when I was younger....made it hard to the usual suspects to get ahold of me to beat on.