• Science
    • Planetary Material Conditions
    • Doomscroll Comments
    • Society
    • Politics
    • Doom
    • Doom Philosophy
    • Solutions
    • General category
    • Revolution
  • Move
  • Topic
  • Back
  • Next

    Iran War Oil Issues

    Started by TDoS Apr 01, 2026, 05:27 PM

    Message path : / Planetary Material Conditions / Peak oil / Iran War Oil Issues #36


    Selected path :

    TDoS

    • ****
    • Negating Negation Negator
    • Posts: 766
    Apr 01, 2026, 05:27 PM
    Quote from: K-Dog on Apr 01, 2026, 04:24 PMPast mistakes or a history degree don't automatically apply now. If his current argument is 'AI-generated' or logically thin, point to the specific place where it is wrong.  And what do you have against history degrees.

    I agree that past behavior demonstrating a lack of critical thinking, consistent logical misfires and no discernable experience in the field of international anything combined with AI could certainly generate a conclusion some might believe is reasonable. Dr Campbell, Dr Hall, and Dr Bardi demonstrate that even advanced degrees are no defense against sometimes tripping over ones past conclusions, so there is no shame for a history major turned geologist to suffer the same.

    I have nothing in particular against history degrees. As I have aged, a knowledge of history has struck me as evver more useful, and even in my field of expertise, occasionally critical. After all, if you don't know the history of a particular field of endeavor, how can you even know where to begin trying to advance an understanding in a particular field?

    Can you imagine some almost PhD somewhere discovering e=mc^2 and getting all excited over the discovery, just KNOWING he/she would win a Nobel for it? Such a thing could easily happen except....then you learn some history and its an "aw-shucks" kind of moment.

    Apparently though Art didn't learn much about the history of oil, or take to heart much from petroleum geologists either before making his proclamations.

    Do you have your own evidence and logical assembly to support his claims (you not having the known history he does of screwing the pooch regularly), or do you just agree with his conclusions? You have your own history of course, but I haven't seen you do the embarassing nonsense and claims I've personally watched him commit.

    However, to be honest, in your case there is a definitive history of political belief and action that indicates you are a deep down believers in certain concepts. Not that it interferes with your overall brain function, but lets say it might be accused of occasionally....coloring.....the certainty of your conclusions.

    This is a

    new Diner page

    Logged in as:Guest
    Forum Home