Quote from: TDoS on Jun 02, 2026, 07:20 PMYou, as an exception, most certainly do not define the rule.
Never said I did. Just that for me as an individual it made more financial sense to take the risk. Which as it turnhs out was the corredt decision. It would have still been true with a few typical accidents as long as the costs came to less than $50K. The only case not true would be a large liabilitty claim if I killed or hurt someone badly. For me, I considered that chance negligible, and again I was right. Had I been wrong,, well the injured party would have been shit out of luck.
RE