Hmmmm, I see some excellent examples of the Backfire effect, but that is par for the course for those who have accepted the Theory of Evolution as reality based. Rather than address the issue brought up by a real scientist about whether or not the cell membrane could have evolved from random undirected processes (NOTE: the graphic above from Organic Chemist Dr. James Tour also evidences how wrong evolutionists are about cell membrane origins.), appeals to Evolution Theory Academic consensus and authority, plus questioning the credentials of said scientist with the temerity to question Evolution Theory ensued. 😕
 
If you Darwinists are so sure that 🦍 Evolution Theory can hold its own in any argument about any part of a cell or any biological mechanism that has the appearance of ☝🏻 Design, why do you refuse to argue the merits, if not because you are very uncomfortable with the very idea that we do not live in a random universe?

Let us forget our disparate worldviews and let us REASON together, shall we? Yeah, I'm a Christian and I do not want any of you to miss out on God's offer of Salvation through Jesus Christ, but that is irrelevant to the nuts and bolts subject of biological mechanisms. Either something COULD evolve or something, that is alive and thrives right now, COULD NOT have evolved. Now you all think everything that is alive evolved from some simpler life form through survival if the fittest natural selection. If that is true, then you need to seriously challenge, with facts, not opinions, ANY science based claim that argues against that assumption.

I'm not here to give you a hard time. If you want to believe this or that, you have free will to do that. I'm just 🤠 gonna post about lots of fascinating animals that we share this planet with. If you can explain, with facts, not opinons, how these animals evolved all the amazing processes in their anatomy and physiology, 'step by step' when they do not work unless the whole mechanism is present from the getgo, then please do.

Or, you can be honest, like this fellow that I respect for his honesty:   
       
Darwin was honest too. Why do you suppose most Darwinists only read what they want to read about what he wrote?
   
I suggest, for the sake of NON-argument, to all of you who believe Evolution is scientifically valid, that you please elect a volunteer, who does not sneer (e.g. K-Dog), to explain to me, without breaking the rules you established here about reasoned and civilized (i.e. no Ad hom or other forms of verbal abuse like disdain, sarcasm, ridicule etc. allowed, you know what I mean) debate, how the Lampsylis Mussel "evolved" its method of reproduction. Please remember, though too many evolutionist forget, that it had to work the FIRST TIME, or there wouldn't be any happy Lampsylis Mussels around today using a very specific species of fish to ensure the survival of a new generation of Lampsylis Mussels. Please spare me terms like "co-evolution" and "common ancestors". Fish and mussels, even by evolutionary biology standards are not even remotely similar genetically. Mussels cannot see. Mussels have no eyes. Mussels never had any eyes. Without EYES an organism CANNOT 'select' through 'random undirected processes' from different types of muscle pattern and color to use as a lure. YET, a small portion of their 'foot' muscle perfectly mimics, IN COLOR AND PATTERN, the APPEARANCE of a species of fish that a very specific type of bass loves to eat. Evolutionists claim this took place over "millions of years". That is obviously false because mussels of this species would have been 'selected OUT' (i.e. DIED OFF due to NO VIABLE OFFSPRING, EXTINCT, you get the idea) if they could not do this from the FIRST generation. To understand why that is so, watch the video. 🧐
 
AGelbert NOTE: Go to 4:42 for Lampsylis Mussel discussion.

Exploration Films 30.9K subscribers 31,273 views  Sep 26, 2021

Enter the fascinating world of animals to reveal sophisticated and complex designs that shake the traditional foundations of evolutionary theory. Featured in this program are Lampsylis Mussel, Horses, Ostrichs, Hummingbirds, Dogs, Manatees, Elephants, Butterflies, Cuttlefish, Penguins and Milopina Bees. Their designs cannot possibly be explained by evolution but only by a Creator.

This series features Dr. Jobe Martin, who for the past 20 years, has been exploring evolution vs. creation. His findings have been fascinating students around the world as he lectures on these remarkable animal designs that cannot be explained by traditional evolution.

Clear evidence that animal designs can only be attributed to a Creator.

Director: Steve Greisen
Writer: Steve Greisen
Stars: ⭐ David Hames, 🌟 Jobe Martin