QuoteNo, your point was that money is a constant source of value.
No I know what my point was. Money is supposed to be a constant reservoir of value. That is the intention and only the intention. Reality is different.
To claim that money is a constant source of value is something an idealist would claim. I claim to keep money as a reasonable facsimile of constant value in the real world is something capitalism can't do. Since I claim that capitalism can't make money stable your claim that I say that money is a constand source of value is without merit.
Capitalists claim money is a constant source of value, not me. I know better. The abstraction of money has no real essence and is man made. Money like god will die when the last human is gone.
Claiming money is a constant source of value is not consistent with dialectical materialism. Such a claim is Hegalian, and not Marxist.