Quote from: TDoS on Jun 15, 2024, 02:23 PM

Quote from: K-Dog on Jun 15, 2024, 08:43 AMThere should be a go fund Keith for my efforts.

Get the thing to kick out the answers with accompanying uncertainty and you wouldn't need to do a Go Fund stunt, someone would pay you for it outright.

This comment presumes that they've upgraded the original model to account for why it didn't work so well in original form of course. And then you'd need to test it against a current and more proven one.

What you be doin tellin me what to do.  Nobody has ever ported the Dynamo Compiler to Javascript.  It could have been done in the Trash-80, Apple-Two days but it was just enough outside the average hackers intellectual league apparently.  It happens that I have the abilities to crack this nut.  And it will take many hours to get this project done.

Fortunately I can work a magnitude of order faster than the original developers (six of them) because the users manual defines the task without ambiguity or at least not more ambiguity than I can handle.  Regardless this amount of work deserves funding because the original effort took 6 man years over several years, and generated 10,000 lines of IBM assembly line code which in a modern JavaScript black box translation will generate 3000 lines of code or more.  If you wonder if I know what I am talking about I have a Masters Degree in software engineering and a fuck of a lot of experience.

My time is valuable.  It is not for you to say what level of effort deserves compensation or not.  If enough people thought it valuable enough maybe I could stop the part time warehouse job and do this sort of thing full time.

My goal is to bring a tool like this to the general public and not to have it inaccessible like your link.  Inaccessible and useless shit no matter how high-falutin it is.  You sir, are a motherfucker.

* if you think I exaggerate the task.  Read the users manual.  The details are there.