Quote from: RE on Jan 01, 2025, 10:08 AMThe rationale is in the motive for the shooting. The Terrorism charge is being brought because he was targeted for his position as CEO of an insurance company. We don't know exactly why this other guy was targeted, but it probably wasn't that. Probably owed money for drugs, or maybe he was fucking the shooter's wife. Anyhow, Luigi's shooting makes a political statement. Thus the Terrorism charge.
RE
I dispute that. If there is a political statement being made it is being made by the state, and all the other players in this drama. Of which we are a small part. Not by the NY suspect who is in the klink, and working with his lawyers I'll guess full time.
All we really have in both cases is video of a shooter, and a man dying on a city street. That is all we know in both cases. Everything else we know is coming from the FSOA and news coverage. Good bad, and everything in-between. Everyone else is filling in the blanks. I go back to the fact that the fossil record shows nearly identical crimes. From my philosophical materialistic point of view, that is all that matters.
Interpretation like the conjuring of the terrorism charge is all in ones head. In both cases dead is dead and really nothing else. That is what the universe sees. The universe saw bullets move. Everything else is a story.
The terrorism charge is a pre-crime charge. The actual charge is murder.