Quote from: TDoS on Jan 18, 2025, 03:52 PMThe same reason people would take the published work of M. K. Hubbert and say he was absolutely right when those charts of his certainly don't look anything like the actual results?
That would be nobody here. You trapped yourself.
Hubbert predates your 'peak oilers' by about fifty years. Everybody knows Hubbersts data is dated. To not see that as fact would be simply stupid. Therefore MKH has only ever been acknowledgedin a qualitative way, and not in the quantitative way you claim. What you claim is logically impossible.