How the bad science of AI doomerism is good for big business

Started by K-Dog Oct 05, 2026, 06:39 AM

Message path : / Society / Tech is always to the rescue / The big AI revolution #118


Selected path :
'Wow, these seem really powerful. Maybe I should consider this investment.'

And the investment money also knows that all this is going to be Too big to fail.  It fails we bail.

And it is not artificial intelligence exactly FYI.  'AI' is actually only a prediction machine that uses math and billions of numbers that represetnt a world state.  To make it 'think' The AI prediction machine has to be in a loop, where results are observed and evaluated.  The agentic loop.  The intelligence is an illusion.

Money, in contrast does have real genuine artificial intelligence.  Intelligent metal, unlike intelligent sand, has the ability to use the brains of real people the way we use an model AI on a terminal.  We use sand refined to pure silicon, and money uses the organic molecules of people refined to raw greed.  Humans, the real thing.

I like our AI generated article summaries because right now they have a certain 'purity'.  They are not generated in a loop.  I use a particular model and it is given general instructions on how to produce the summary which only uses article contents.  It is more like snapping a photo than actually writing about what is in the article.   Think about it, a photo is a summary.  It has taken in the environment, and summarized it with some loss of information.  Not much different, and the system prompt (instructions) that does it is the lens.

Great website, this was there too.  Very revealing, and for the same social reasons the article discusses is why I do the Diner.  I am not a Substack Drone, or a Discord Drone, and certainly not a Facebook Drone, or any other censored drone on a homogenized Mickey-Ds platform. "Better to Reign in Hell, Than Serve in Heaven" doncha know.  And I do not confuse pride and freedom in that statement.  Can't serve good, when good really it isn't.  To actually decide what is good, you must be the ruler of yourself.

THEBULLETIN.ORG 2025-07-10

AI for good, with caveats: How a keynote speaker was censored during an international artificial intelligence summit

The AI for Good Global Summit 2025 drew backlash after speaker Abeba Birhane was forced to dilute her presentation, removing references to major tech firms and conflicts in Palestine and Israel despite her evidence-based work on algorithmic bias and corporate complicity. She delivered her talk under pressure, condemning the event’s prioritization of corporate interests over ethical responsibility and the marginalization of critical voices in AI development.

This is an article where the fact that it is more than a year old means nothing at all.

This is a

new Diner page

Logged in as:Guest
Forum Home