The Levant

[K-Dog]

Clear and unambiguous.

[K-Dog]

Quite a rant.

So many reasons why Joe must go.

Israeli snipers fire at north Gaza hospital staff <- Right Now

45,000 dead in the latest war there. 

With the fall of Syria Zionism prevails.

[TDoS]

Quite a rant.

So if one side of the rant is someone convicted of sex offenses with a minor versus...don't recognize the lady...somone of similar moral turpitude? Who is she, someone who has just a few misdeameanor convictions, maybe minor drug dealing, or is was she a molestor of little boys or something?

[K-Dog]

About Sabrina

Sabrina grew up overseas and in the US. She often jokes about not having a hometown, because her family served in the military, and her family moved around a lot.

She first became interested in politics after she joined her high school debate team, where she won several debate competitions. She also developed broadcasting skills in her high school's Programming & Broadcasting class. It was this course that first taught her how to conduct interviews.

Sabrina studied broadcast journalism & and English as an undergrad. She graduated with a BA from the University of South Carolina. She later graduated with a master's degree in Education from Northeastern University. Sabrina worked in higher education for ten years as an academic advisor at colleges such as MIT and Boston University. While she enjoyed working with students, she felt restricted in higher education due to administrative bureaucracy.

Sabby Sabs podcast was created in January 2021 after progressive members of the House refused to Force the Vote for Medicare For All. As a former supporter of Bernie Sanders and the squad, Sabrina was disappointed with squad members refusing to fight back against establishment Democrats. The ineffectiveness of the squad pushed Sabrina to leave the Democratic Party and become a registered independent. This also pushed her to focus on other solutions, such as ballot initiatives, mutual aid, and third parties. She continues to encourage her viewers to focus on local organizing efforts and breaking the duopoly.

She later joined the Revolutionary Blackout Network as a co-host and member, hosting summits and organizing events with fellow members. As part of RBN, she started the Boston RBN Chapter, which focuses on mutual aid. Each RBN member has a chapter in their respective cities.

Since Sabby Sabs podcast started, Sabrina has traveled to different states covering protests and rallies, received two media awards, and interviewed guests such as Chris Hedges, Cornel West, Kim Iversen, Matt Taibbi, Garland Nixon, and Jill Stein to name a few. She has been featured on shows like The Hill's Rising, The Kim Iversen Show, Sputnik Radio, CrossTalk, and more.

[K-Dog]

Quite a rant.

So if one side of the rant is someone convicted of sex offenses with a minor versus...don't recognize the lady...somone of similar moral turpitude? Who is she, someone who has just a few misdeameanor convictions, maybe minor drug dealing, or is was she a molestor of little boys or something?

Ritter, an outspoken critic of the war in Iraq, had a sexually graphic online chat in 2009 with an undercover police officer posing as a 15-year-old girl named Emily. 

Ritter was set up.

[RE]

Quite a rant.

So if one side of the rant is someone convicted of sex offenses with a minor versus...don't recognize the lady...somone of similar moral turpitude? Who is she, someone who has just a few misdeameanor convictions, maybe minor drug dealing, or is was she a molestor of little boys or something?

Ritter, an outspoken critic of the war in Iraq, had a sexually graphic online chat in 2009 with an undercover police officer posing as a 15-year-old girl named Emily. 

Ritter was set up.

The best they can do to discredit him is to set him up with a cop posing as a 15 year old girl?  They couldn't find a real 15 year old girl to set him up with?  Does he have a record of prior sexual offenses with underage girls?  If not, why would they drop a cop faking he was an underage girl to entrap him?  Political assassination, of course.

Anytime a political figure is charged with a crime of moral turpitude, particularly sex with a minor, it's generally a setup.  Nothing ruins somebody's political standing like being accused of being a pedophile.  The knee jerk reaction by the vox populi is discount anything he says about any topic at all.  In this case, there wasn't even a crime since the cop wasn't really underage.  Pathetic.

RE

[TDoS]

Ritter, an outspoken critic of the war in Iraq, had a sexually graphic online chat in 2009 with an undercover police officer posing as a 15-year-old girl named Emily. 

Ritter was set up.

Let's start with the basics, shall we? Plenty of people were outspoken critics of the Iraq war. Are you claiming that all outspoken critics of the Iraq war were pervs? I doubt it. So we can't say that being outspoken on a war made him a perv.

So what did make him a perv? There was Scott...hanging out online, like on your website, and started chatting with someone who told you they were a 15 year old girl. I'm sure you, me and RE would all begin happily chatting with children, right? Maybe. So this claimed CHILD says..."yo...big boy...won't you show me your junk?". And you and me and RE laugh heartily at the idea, having some fucking brains and not being pervs.

Scott decides to happily oblige. So was he set up? Sure. Would YOU have been? Or me? Not me for a second.

And WHY wouldn't you or I have been set up? We aren't pervs, can't be made to be pervs by anyone online, and it has NOTHING to do with your objection, or REs or my objection to the Iraq war.

So Scott is a perv, and all that happened was he revealed it like a complete moron because...pervs don't think with their brains.

I recommend not being a perv.Otherwise at the first opportunity, you yourself might reveal...YOU ARE A PERV!

[TDoS]

The best they can do to discredit him is to set him up with a cop posing as a 15 year old girl?

They didn't discredit him. Being a convicted perv doesn't mean his prior opinions were biased or weird. Just that he was a perv. It is cretins who confuse weird behavior (legal or otherwise) with the credibility of someone's opinion on entirely another topic.

Anytime a political figure is charged with a crime of moral turpitude, particularly sex with a minor, it's generally a setup.

Yes...pervs are never pervs until someone tempts them into it. "I'm sorry your honor....I know she was 13..but DAMN she looked 14...and my online friend told me it was okay if she was so yee hah I went for it!!!"

In this case, there wasn't even a crime since the cop wasn't really underage.  Pathetic.
RE

As a recent juror and new expert on court instructions and following the law, of course there was a crime committed....and this particular perv was convicted of it. Didn't matter that he was faked into it...only mattered that given the opportunity....he went for it like an alkie when they see what they think is filled bottle of Jack Daniels unattended somewhere and steal it....doesn't matter it was filled with water.  A thief is a thief.

[RE]

What was the crime he was convicted of?  Soliciting sex with a person faking they are underage?  Did they actually have sex?

RE

[K-Dog]

What was the crime he was convicted of?  Soliciting sex with a person faking they are underage?  Did they actually have sex?

RE

No it was all online.  But it was enough for the F.B.I. to board an airplane and take Ritter's passport to prevent him from visiting Moscow.  TDOS knew this, or he knew it and forgot about it because I remember he saw an article I posted a few months ago and he commented on it.  His memory gets questionable sometimes.

He may have choked the chicken online, I don't know.  Regardless it was a sting.

[K-Dog]

What was the crime he was convicted of?  Soliciting sex with a person faking they are underage?  Did they actually have sex?

RE

No it was all online.  But it was enough for the F.B.I. to board an airplane and take Ritter's passport to prevent him from visiting Moscow.  TDOS knew this, or he knew it and forgot about it because I remember he saw an article I posted a few months ago about the airplane and he commented on it.  His memory gets questionable sometimes.

Ritter may have choked the chicken online, I don't know.  Regardless it was a sting.

[RE]

His memory gets questionable sometimes.

It's the Alzheimer's.  Maybe there's a shortage of Donepezil and Galantamine due to a supply chain disruption.

RE

[TDoS]

What was the crime he was convicted of?

Oh, His story isn't just about the crime he was convicted of, but of the core issue here, that of him being a raging perv.

So in 2001 he got caught in a perv sting when he tried to lure what he thought was a 16 year old girl to the local Burger King. The case was sealed and "disappeared" so the world wouldn't think poorly of him.

And then, in his desire to PROVE he was indeed a perv, he was wacking off in front of someone online he thought was an underage girl. So now we have DOUBLE proof of perv-dom.

Soliciting sex with a person faking they are underage? 

So clever for a short fellow. Of course not, silly. Looks like it is unlawful contact with a minor.

Apparently the jury found it quite enlightening, his behavior, the video, his intent to want to do BAD things with children. Obviously the jury followed the rules as they are in the LAW as opposed to you pretending there needed to be an actual underage child involved. How quaint! Your degree from Columbia isn't in law, right? If it were I would worry about elderly dementia setting in, this being an easy one even for amateurs. If all of this is obvious to oilfield schmucks like me from just being a juror for a week in a murder trial, YOU certainly should be FULLY informed by just mind melding with a local law library! Wouldn't be of much use to the Illuminati if you couldn't do that by age 12, right?

Did they actually have sex?
RE

You seem to have sex on your mind. Are the nursing staff not...amenable...to your charms? Show them the cool non-working 3D printer, or tell them some Illuminati stories, you've got to have something left to WOW them with. Are you allowed much booze? Squirrel it away until you've got enough for a small party, pick the most pliable one, and go to work! You might be missing a leg, but you aren't married like K-Dog and I and you ain't dead yet so there is still hope!

[K-Dog]

The case was sealed and "disappeared" so the world wouldn't think poorly of him.

So how do you know about it.

The way I know to get things 'sealed' is to be found not guilty of something.

What is the chance of someone being picked in two random sex stings?  The answer is zip city. 

Most pervs never even get caught in one.  But if you are caught in one and found not guilty in court you are probably not guilty.  Duh.

Officers in sex stings are often paid overtime.  We already learned this month that money makes people pearl clutch.  You forget already?  An overtime tribe of volunteers is far to zealous and willing to set someone up to get the BAD  GUY.  It is rare for someone to fight a sting charge in court after being setup. It takes money to do that if you are innocent or not.

If someone in particular is targeted, AN ARREST WILL BE MADE.  Then any lies told to make that arrest can be sorted out to get at the truth only if the case goes to court and if the person charged is willing to pay to have the truth exposed.  Alternatively lies simply are not sorted out.  If a 'deal' is offered to an arrest victim as an easier out, truth is forever sealed.

The defense of entrapment is raised when the government, or those associated with the government, act to induce a person to commit a crime.  It happens.

A King County Superior Court judge sentenced a former Kentridge High School teacher on Friday to 16 months in jail and 24 months of community supervision for sex crimes with a minor.

That happened 10 years ago.  And the 'minor' never existed.

Seattle Police arrested XXXXXX in September 2013 outside of a downtown McDonald's as part of an undercover sting where a detective posed online as a 15-year-old girl seeking sex with older men in exchange for money.

XXXXXX went to prison for sex crimes with a minor who never existed.  There is no way you can convince me this is right.  There is no way you can tell me this perp's desires were not manipulated to make an arrest, and that any mental machinery or qualms that this defendant had in place to keep him from crossing 'the line' was deliberately targeted by undercover officers and defeated.  The intent of their activity was to generate a crime and they did.

It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.

Innocent until manipulated to look guilty is not the way law should work.  Fighting your own daemons is part of freedom, and I won't have big daddy law telling me what is right and wrong.  I decide that for myself.

Imagined violations of law are not violations of law. 

[TDoS]

What was the crime he was convicted of?  Soliciting sex with a person faking they are underage?  Did they actually have sex?

RE

No it was all online.  But it was enough for the F.B.I. to board an airplane and take Ritter's passport to prevent him from visiting Moscow.  TDOS knew this, or he knew it and forgot about it because I remember he saw an article I posted a few months ago and he commented on it.  His memory gets questionable sometimes.

He may have choked the chicken online, I don't know.  Regardless it was a sting.

I remember. And it was a sting. And neither of you has dared mention that if perv bait was dropped in front of us, we would laugh it off and keep moving. But perv bait in front of Scott? He gets naked and shows off the wonders of his equipment! He was just ITCHING to be famous in front of some underage child.

Tell me, how does someone get stung by a sting if they aren't exactly the perv he has NOW DEMONSTRATED TWICE? yeah..some of that logic stuff, I know tricky for us old farts!