Figure out how to live in the worst-case. 
Or play Rambo in the woods, and max out your privilege. 

Your thoughts?

Main Menu

In Supreme Court battle over transgender rights, conservatives look to an unlikely

Started by RE, Dec 03, 2024, 08:23 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

K-Dog

How about Tranny reparations?  Anybody who decides they are the opposite sex gets a cash bonus and a pay increase (if they work) based on the discrimination they would have experienced had they done the switcheroo in times past.



The rest of us can pay fines and do community service based on the exploitation we gave to ourselves by NOT letting our gender horses run free.  We oppressed ourselves.  Now we must pay.  Bezos has to give a free ride into space to all trannies who wanted to become astronauts but could not do so because society was out to get them.

Perhaps my ideas are extreme?  No problem, I am not on the Supreme Court.  But since Clarence Thomas is on the court, buggery is sure to become the law of the land if he can convince ice queen Barrett.

QuoteThe issue could remain at the center of the political conversation after the inauguration next month of President-elect Donald Trump, who made opposition to transgender rights central to his campaign's closing message.

The court's three liberal justices seem firmly on the side of the Biden administration and the families who are challenging the Tennessee law.

But it's not clear that any of the court's six conservatives will go along.

Five conservatives have voiced varying degrees of skepticism of the challengers' arguments. Gorsuch has yet to say anything.

Common sense says modern medicine should not be used for social non-medical reasons
.


But hey not everyone agrees. 

The capitalist machine wants pre-teens to change sex.  They will be dependent on the medical apparatus for the rest of their fucking lives.  Millions will be made from trannies and they will be exploited up the ying-yang, literally.

Will the court consider long term consequences?

Fuck no they will not.

  • Some procedures may require follow-up surgeries or revisions to maintain desired results, particularly for complex reconstructions like vaginoplasty or phalloplasty.
  • Regular medical care is necessary to monitor both surgical sites and overall health due to the interplay between surgery and ongoing hormone therapy.
  • Access to high-quality care and post-operative follow-ups can be limited depending on geographic and financial factors.

No national medical care.  Unless you are a freak.  How is this fair?  Die of cancer because you can't afford treatment.  But if it makes you feel better, you don't have the money to cut your cock off either.  Cest la vie.  Suck it up.

The distraction serves its purpose.  The proxy wars are being re-arranged.  Nothing to see here move along is what our overlords want.


Washington's War in Ukraine: Narrowing Options, Growing Consequences

Sucking Russsia into Syria is the new game.  Distractions are in overdrive.

RE

Quote from: K-Dog on Dec 04, 2024, 11:45 AM
  • Some procedures may require follow-up surgeries or revisions to maintain desired results, particularly for complex reconstructions like vaginoplasty or phalloplasty.
  • Regular medical care is necessary to monitor both surgical sites and overall health due to the interplay between surgery and ongoing hormone therapy.
  • Access to high-quality care and post-operative follow-ups can be limited depending on geographic and financial factors.

Add to those a vastly shorter average lifespan.  Although the pro-surgical mutilation folks say it's "inconclusive" and the result of discrimination and violence, the average lifespan is probably about 25 years less for men who have their sausage guillotined.

Anecdotally, I had a childhood friend (Randi the guy/tranny I did Pirate Radio with who got the operation in his late teens) who died of pneumonia when he was in his early 60s.  His dad lived to his late 80s and mom to her 90s.

The maintenance issues on those fake vaginas are substantial.  It's nothing like a real one, it doesn't have the glands that secrete lubricant and it's just a cul de sac pocket formed by turning the penis inside out.  So after sex it has to be thoroughly douched and cleaned, and even without the sex you have to clean carefully because it's a fabulous place for bacteria to colonize.  This obviously will lead to greater incidence of infections over the years.  Your immune system is also affected by the erratic hormone levels that swing up and down when you take your pills or get injections.


As I have pointed out before, although in modern industrial countries we call these folks "transexual" there is little difference from the Eunuchs of earlier eras who were employed guarding Harems, or the Castrati, boys who were castrated to keep their soprano voices for choirs, not to mention for sex with Bishops and Abbots.  Who was it that got so lucky?  For smaller boys from poor families who wouldn't make god soldiers, this was their meal ticket.  In the book "The Last Eunuch" the chief Eunuch to the Chinese Emperor  told his life story, including how his father did the surgery before presenting him as a present to the Emperor when he was 9.  It took months for him to recover, he was lucky to survive it at all.

Today this is presented as the choice of the child, but tell me, how can a child who can't even consent to have sex give consent to be permanently mutilated?  It's absurd.  Today though, parents with a boy who has feminine mannerisms are convinced he'd be happier with a sex reassignment.  It's all cultural nonsense.

Is this really a threat to the Constitution and Equal Protection?  I don't think so really, not when it come to medical care.  Men and women have different organs, so obviously "equal" doesn't mean "same".  Just because you offer Testosterone supplements to males doesn't mean you have to offer them to females.

Anyhow, personally I think goobermint simply needs to get out of the bizness of legislating any of this.  Take all the laws relating to sex off the books and leave it to the parents and kids to decide what they want.  If they are brainwashed enough to buy into all of this, it's their bizness.

https://www.vox.com/scotus/389737/supreme-court-transgender-us-skrmetti-health-care-tennessee

The horrifying implications of today's Supreme Court argument on trans rights

RE

K-Dog

QuoteAnyhow, personally I think goobermint simply needs to get out of the bizness of legislating any of this.

Basically I agree, but some kind of third party oversight might be a good idea.  An ethics committee to protect the vulnerable (young) from crazy hateful people.

RE



The results of this poll should be no surprise, since the whole idea of using drugs and surgery to change males to females & vica versa simply doesn't work.  "Trans-women" aren't women at all, they're chemically and/or surgically mutilated and neutered men.  Basically the equivalent of a Gelding horse.

On the sports participation front, if you look at it this way you CAN let trannies participate, just they have to compete against males who still have their balls.  Geldings run against stallions, and occassionally are fast enough to win.  Some Fillies do also.

The numbers also demonstrate why this agenda is absolutely killing the Democratic party.  Progressives who have enough CFS to stand against the attempt to normalize transexuality find themselves unable to vote for candidates who are pushing this agenda.  We need another party that is Progressive on economics and traditional on gender roles.  Otherwise we'll keep getting more Trumps elected.

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/americans-overwhelmingly-support-restricting-transgender-procedures-for-minors-survey-finds/

Americans Overwhelmingly Support Restricting Transgender Procedures for Minors, Survey Finds

REE

RE

#4

ABOVETHELAW.COM 2026-04-06

Donald Trump Went To Supreme Court To Watch Live As Birthright Citizenship Policy Got Thoroughly Smoked

Kavanaugh seemed most interested in finding a quick and easy way out of the case that could make the right decision while staying in Trump’s good graces.

Barrett didn't prove any more friendly to the government. Sauer kept trying to create a distinction based on people coming to America with an intent to remain — advancing the dubious theory that African slaves brought to the United States — and inarguably covered by the birthright citizenship clause — took the view that slavery sucks, but hey at least we live here now! Barrett bypassed this insanity to ask the related question about the children of human trafficking victims brought to the United States illegally. Sauer's answer could best be described as... confused.

Trumpolini seems to have lost his Mojo with the SCOTUS. 😁


RE

K-Dog

#5


Trumpolini tried for too much.  His excess greed disturbs the peaceful domination of the upper class.  Trump has made rich people look foolish, and the reason for the black robes in the Supreme Court is to make rich, and people with too much time on their hands look smart.