Figure out how to live in the worst-case. 
Or play Rambo in the woods, and max out your privilege. 

Your thoughts?

Main Menu

In Supreme Court battle over transgender rights, conservatives look to an unlikely

Started by RE, Dec 03, 2024, 08:23 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

K-Dog

QuoteAnyhow, personally I think goobermint simply needs to get out of the bizness of legislating any of this.

Basically I agree, but some kind of third party oversight might be a good idea.  An ethics committee to protect the vulnerable (young) from crazy hateful people.

RE



The results of this poll should be no surprise, since the whole idea of using drugs and surgery to change males to females & vica versa simply doesn't work.  "Trans-women" aren't women at all, they're chemically and/or surgically mutilated and neutered men.  Basically the equivalent of a Gelding horse.

On the sports participation front, if you look at it this way you CAN let trannies participate, just they have to compete against males who still have their balls.  Geldings run against stallions, and occassionally are fast enough to win.  Some Fillies do also.

The numbers also demonstrate why this agenda is absolutely killing the Democratic party.  Progressives who have enough CFS to stand against the attempt to normalize transexuality find themselves unable to vote for candidates who are pushing this agenda.  We need another party that is Progressive on economics and traditional on gender roles.  Otherwise we'll keep getting more Trumps elected.

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/americans-overwhelmingly-support-restricting-transgender-procedures-for-minors-survey-finds/

Americans Overwhelmingly Support Restricting Transgender Procedures for Minors, Survey Finds

REE

RE

#2

ABOVETHELAW.COM 2026-04-06

Donald Trump Went To Supreme Court To Watch Live As Birthright Citizenship Policy Got Thoroughly Smoked

Kavanaugh seemed most interested in finding a quick and easy way out of the case that could make the right decision while staying in Trump’s good graces.

Barrett didn't prove any more friendly to the government. Sauer kept trying to create a distinction based on people coming to America with an intent to remain — advancing the dubious theory that African slaves brought to the United States — and inarguably covered by the birthright citizenship clause — took the view that slavery sucks, but hey at least we live here now! Barrett bypassed this insanity to ask the related question about the children of human trafficking victims brought to the United States illegally. Sauer's answer could best be described as... confused.

Trumpolini seems to have lost his Mojo with the SCOTUS. 😁


RE

K-Dog

#3


Trumpolini tried for too much.  His excess greed disturbs the peaceful domination of the upper class.  Trump has made rich people look foolish, and the reason for the black robes in the Supreme Court is to make rich, and people with too much time on their hands look smart.