Cole Allen's manifesto in full:

QuoteHello everybody!

So I may have given a lot of people a surprise today. Let me start off by apologizing to everyone whose trust I abused.

I apologize to my parents for saying I had an interview without specifying it was for "Most Wanted."

I apologize to my colleagues and students for saying I had a personal emergency (by the time anyone reads this, I probably most certainly DO need to go to the ER, but can hardly call that not a self-inflicted status.)

I apologize to all of the people I traveled next to, all the workers who handled my luggage, and all the other non-targeted people at the hotel who I put in danger simply by being near.

I apologize to everyone who was abused and/or murdered before this, to all those who suffered before I was able to attempt this, to all who may still suffer after, regardless of my success or failure.

I don't expect forgiveness, but if I could have seen any other way to get this close, I would have taken it. Again, my sincere apologies.

On to why I did any of this:

I am a citizen of the United States of America.

What my representatives do reflects on me.

And I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes.

(Well, to be completely honest, I was no longer willing a long time ago, but this is the first real opportunity I've had to do something about it.)

While I'm discussing this, I'll also go over my expected rules of engagement (probably in a terrible format, but I'm not military so too bad.)

Administration officials (not including Mr. Patel): they are targets, prioritized from highest-ranking to lowest

Secret Service: they are targets only if necessary, and to be incapacitated non-lethally if possible (aka, I hope they're wearing body armor because center mass with shotguns messes up people who *aren't*

Hotel Security: not targets if at all possible (aka unless they shoot at me)

Capitol Police: same as Hotel Security

National Guard: same as Hotel Security

Hotel Employees: not targets at all

Guests: not targets at all

In order to minimize casualties I will also be using buckshot rather than slugs (less penetration through walls)

I would still go through most everyone here to get to the targets if it were absolutely necessary (on the basis that most people *chose* to attend a speech by a pedophile, rapist, and traitor, and are thus complicit) but I really hope it doesn't come to that.

Rebuttals to objections:

Objection 1: As a Christian, you should turn the other cheek.

Rebuttal: Turning the other cheek is for when you yourself are oppressed. I'm not the person raped in a detention camp. I'm not the fisherman executed without trial. I'm not a schoolkid blown up or a child starved or a teenage girl abused by the many criminals in this administration.

Turning the other cheek when *someone else* is oppressed is not Christian behavior; it is complicity in the oppressor's crimes.

Objection 2: This is not a convenient time for you to do this.

Rebuttal: I need whoever thinks this way to take a couple minutes and realize that the world isn't about them. Do you think that when I see someone raped or murdered or abused, I should walk on by because it would be "inconvenient" for people who aren't the victim?

This was the best timing and chance of success I could come up with.

Objection 3: You didn't get them all.

Rebuttal: Gotta start somewhere.

Objection 4: As a half-black, half-white person, you shouldn't be the one doing this.

Rebuttal: I don't see anyone else picking up the slack

Objection 5: Yield unto Caesar what is Caesar's.

Rebuttal: The United States of America are ruled by the law, not by any one or several people. In so far as representatives and judges do not follow the law, no one is required to yield them anything so unlawfully ordered.

I would also like to extend my appreciation to a great many people since I will not be likely to be able to talk with them again (unless the Secret Service is *astoundingly* incompetent.)

Thank you to my family, both personal and church, for your love over these 31 years.

Thank you to my friends, for your companionship over many years.

Thank you to my colleagues over many jobs, for your positivity and professionalism.

Thank you to my students for your enthusiasm and love of learning.

Thank you to the many acquaintances I've met, in person and online, for short interactions and long-term relationships, for your perspectives and inspiration.

Thank you all for everything.

Sincerely,

Cole "coldForce" "Friendly Federal Assassin" Allen

PS: Ok now that all the sappy stuff is done, what the hell is the Secret Service doing? Sorry, gonna rant a bit here and drop the formal tone.

Like, I expected security cameras at every bend, bugged hotel rooms, armed agents every 10 feet, metal detectors out the wazoo.

What I got (who knows, maybe they're pranking me!) is nothing.

No damn security.

Not in transport.

Not in the hotel.

Not in the event.

Like, the one thing that I immediately noticed walking into the hotel is the sense of arrogance.

I walk in with multiple weapons and not a single person there considers the possibility that I could be a threat.

The security at the event is all outside, focused on protestors and current arrivals, because apparently no one thought about what happens if someone checks in the day before.

Like, this level of incompetence is insane, and I very sincerely hope it's corrected by the time this country gets actually competent leadership again.

Like, if I was an Iranian agent, instead of an American citizen, I could have brought a damn Ma Deuce in here and no one would have noticed shit.

Dude.  They know you are there.  You are a weapon of mass deception, and you do not even know you are part of a plan.  That is the point. Since you don't know, there is no connection to you for anyone to trace. You are just one of a few thousand targeted individuals.  But you are a targeted individual with a three word name going on.  And you are the one who happens to be in the right place at the right time.  All they needed was for you to walk through the door, and for you to let your freak flag fly.  They did not need your cooperation.  They just needed you to do your thing.  That way if any doors were opened for you to get to the main event to do your thing, there is no way for anyone to ever know.  Their deniability is not simply plausible.  It is actual.  Total operational security.  Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is in a living tomb, and like him you will soon be too.  The same one.  Patsies for life both of you. <- Kdog

Actually insane.

Oh and if anyone is curious is how doing something like feels: it's awful. I want to throw up; I want to cry for all the things I wanted to do and never will, for all the people whose trust this betrays; I experience rage thinking about everything this administration has done.

Can't really recommend it! Stay in school, kids.

But is it real?

The "PS" section, where Allen critiques the security, feels less like a manifesto and more like a narrative device in a thriller novel. Real-world attackers would focus on the success of their attack.  Allen is focusing on the incompetence of the men in black.  Fictional antagonists designed to show the author is full of himself perhaps!? Something about this does not jive.  Thinking about how stupid your opponents are is not something you are going to do when rolling the big dice. It does not fit.  But it would fit in creative writing.  In real life concentration on your plan would be what your are thinking about.

This is not a joke:

Beyond Labels: Understanding Tantric Sex and Relationship Dynamics

In a recent discussion, the nuances of relationship structures—including polyamory and monogamy—were explored alongside a fascinating breakdown of Tantric sex. For many, Tantra is often misunderstood, but it offers a structured approach to intimacy that can be categorized into three distinct "colors," each serving a different purpose and energy.
Tantric Sex: The Three Paths

A key takeaway from the conversation is that Tantric sex is not a singular experience. It is defined by three specific modalities: White, Black, and Red.

    White Tantra (The Spiritual Path): This is the most widely recognized form. While physical intimacy and penetration may be involved, the central focus is on spiritual connection. Positions and eye contact are intentionally utilized to maximize this spiritual alignment, fostering a deep, non-physical bond between partners.

    Black Tantra (The Physical Path): In stark contrast to the spiritual focus of the White path, Black Tantra is intensely physical and grounded in the material realm. It is characterized by high energy, raw intensity, and a lack of the "spiritual gaze" found in White Tantra. It is often described as being more visceral, similar to the intensity seen in adult cinematography, with an emphasis on sheer vitality and physical release.

    Red Tantra (The Path of Power): This modality shares the physical intensity of Black Tantra but is defined by a specific shift in power dynamics. Red Tantra involves the conscious exercise of dominance and submission. It is described as a deliberate choice of role-play, where participants step into a dynamic of exercising power over one another.

Choice and Flexibility in Intimacy

A critical aspect of these practices is conscious choice. The speakers emphasized that partners in an intimate relationship do not have to be locked into one mode. Instead, they can mutually decide in the moment—"Today we are feeling White, or perhaps today we are feeling Black"—allowing the energy of the encounter to dictate the path.

This flexibility highlights that intimacy is a dynamic, evolving state rather than a static definition.
Distinguishing Sex, Love, and Polyamory

The conversation also touched upon the broader context of modern relationships, clarifying the distinction between different types of connections:

    Physiological/Recreational Sex: Not every sexual encounter needs to be rooted in deep romantic love. There is a "sporting" or purely recreational aspect to sex where the goal is mutual fun and pleasure. These encounters can be wonderful and fulfilling in their own right, even without the expectation of an emotional or romantic partnership.

    Making Love: This is defined separately from the act of sex. "Making love" implies a deeper, more profound emotional connection that goes beyond the purely physical or recreational, serving as a distinct experience altogether.

    Relationship Structures: The speaker noted that there is a significant difference between relationship labels like "polyamory" and the concept of physical fidelity. Regardless of whether a couple is monogamous or practices polyamory, the internal agreement and the type of sexual engagement—whether spiritual, physical, or power-focused—are personal choices that depend entirely on the individuals involved.

Ultimately, the discussion serves as a reminder that intimacy is a spectrum. Whether through the spiritual heights of White Tantra, the raw intensity of Black Tantra, or the power dynamics of Red Tantra, the key is authentic communication and shared intent between partners.

The President of Argentina lets his freak flag fly.  Who coulda knowd.

QuoteArgentina, Milei said, will become the first nation to create "entities operated by AI agents or robots ... human shareholders may participate, but are not required". Milei went even further, proposing that such AI-owned corporations would be protected by safeguards from legal action. "Limited liability is not a luxury for such entities; it is a precondition for their existence," Milei wrote.

And now featuring Peter Thiel too.




It has been my opinion that sex and politics are separate issues and should be treated as such.  As a representative of a historical left having to do with economic conditions and social equities, not with what a person does below the belt, I don't like politics getting involved with sex.  I think mixing the two up dilutes economic equity.

But here I am going to say it is relevant.

QuoteA dynamic of exercising power over one another.

Really dude, I'll let these words do the talking.

QuoteSouthern man, better keep your head
Don't forget what your good book said
Southern change gonna come at last
Now your crosses are burning fast
Southern man

QuoteFrom the crude elements available to them, Argentina's 1970s generals constructed a surveillance system that included a "paper twin" of every individual relevant to them in their obsession to predict in which direction society would turn.

The generals fed their surveillance monster not with algorithms that can scrape social media for psychological profiles, but with phone recordings that required patient transcribing and diligent indexing before the database could be searchable – something that would take a split second for the digital services that Thiel's Palantir is providing to governments around the world today.

Can we guess what Argentinian Generals will do with Data Centers? Or do you think the idea died out when the Argentinian Generals from the 70's died.  Never to be discussed in their still existing conservative circles again.